Frontier Justice
Thursday December 22nd 2005, 4:48 pm
Filed under: Tinfoil Helmet

This is one of those classic stories that just make you go WTF?

David Letterman, he of the TV show, is presently fighting a restraining order taken out against him by a woman in Sante Fe who claims that he has been sending her ‘code words’ by television.

Seriously here, this is not a pisstake and its not April 1st.

Apparently a woman called Collen Nestler filed and received a restraining order against Letterman which bans him from going within three yards of her person after claiming that after she’d started sending ‘thoughts of love’ to him in 1993 (they’ve never actually met) Lettermen responded with coded gestures and words in his TV which conveyed his desire for her in addition to inviting her out east to become his co-host.

This, she claims, caused her mental cruelty and sleep deprivation for 11 years and resulted in her going bankrupt.

More bizarre still - and presumably because of some legal quirk - Letterman has filed suit to quash the restraining order on the grounds that Santa Fe district court has no jurisidiction over his actions in New York, Nestler’s failure to serve him with papers and other procedural issues. The fact that Nestor is in obvious need of psychiatric assistance and a total froot-loop seems to be neither here nor there.

About the only this not clear here is whether, due to the restraining order, Nestor has to sit more than three yards from her TV set when watching the Letterman show.

A bit of digging in the US press (the Free New Mexican) shows this to be a temporary restraining order for 10 days until a full hearing can be convened in which Nestler asks not only that Letterman stay more than three yards away from her at all times but also that he be ‘forbidden from thinking about her’.

The District Judge, Daniel Sanchez, who signed the order has apparently responded that:

[H]e doesn’t sign every temporary restraining order he is presented with, but if an applicant makes a “proper allegation� that warrants the issuance of a restraining order, he’ll sign it.

(Makes you wonder what the one’s he doesn’t sign are like..???)

What I can categorically state here is that there is absolutely no truth in the rumour that civil servants from the Home Office have been dispatched to Sante Fe to recruit Judge Sanchez to join the Special Immigration Appeals Court where his ability to sign off on court orders based on claims to what a defendant might have been thinking will no doubt come in extremely useful and make a prized asset in the war against terror.

License

This work is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 England & Wales License.


1 Comment so far
Leave a comment

Certainly the woman is crazy, but is there any truth to her claim?

What the general public does not realize, is that all broadcast stations and many specific television shows are playing the Mooks and shearing the Sheeple.

Every broadcast network tries to collect as much information as possible from the public, about its programs. There are many ways that this is done. Numerous television shows will also separately collect, analyze and use feedback from the public. Every word of every letter or email sent to a television station or program is scrutinized. Details as to likes and dislikes are gleaned, and the information is used to provide direction, as well as develop new material. Personal anecdotes from the viewers are captured and the core messages of these mini stories are likely to be incorporated into the show.

This is referred to as reflecting. Reflecting back to the fans, that which they divulge in their communiqués. It is a strategy very similar to the ‘cold reading’ technique performed by tarot card readers. The Mark is not aware of how much they are revealing, or to what purpose their entanglement might be used.

There are practical reasons for generating and perpetuating communications with viewers. It is difficult to know public sentiment while preoccupied with a daily show. Anything the public has to say may be used in creating content. It is difficult to continually come up with new ideas and things to say without regular input from the audience, as well as other sources. It is easy to become stale in a relatively brief period of time and the ratings will immediately reflect it.

However the application of such practices can and does lead to collateral damage. The Mark or Mook is being lead-on. There are ample teasers in the form of buzzwords, gestures and visuals which are intended to excite the interested person or persons. Instigation, antagonism and other forms of provocation are often used to whip up the target. Taking their cue from ubiquitous good cop bad cop scenes, the program creators push whatever buttons they can detect.

Creating conflict between a show and individuals or certain groups or other shows is all part of hightening the drama. It contributes to creating a sense of edginess which translates into ratings and dollars. The dance they dance can be dangerous for mentally unstable individuals, from within the viewing public.

The cast members and writers of sophisticated daily television programs share ideas and information. They collaborate. Writers who work for multiple programs bring with them the knowledge and ideas generated by their other gigs. The friendships that develop among members of different shows, mostly on the same network, are used to assist each other in various ways, such as promoting each other’s projects and programs and playing the Mooks.

It is all part of creating buzz, and it is easy for the dramatis personae and crew to transgress. The heady buzz created in the pursuit of ratings and dollars makes it easy to break ethical standards. Unfortunately for an unsuspecting few, the fantasy of television can become their reality and the result is devastating. The only real question that remains is whether the network programs are culpable, or not.

Comment by cn 12.25.05 @ 4:09 pm



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)